If there are any
local Councillors reading this, can we suggest that you get hold
a copy of yesterday's Evening Post?
Once you’ve choked on your seemingly infinite supply of tea
and biscuits and got past the front page splash (or perhaps that
should be dunk?) then there are a couple of articles in there which
may just help you to understand and maybe even the solve the ongoing
issue that is parking around the Memorial Stadium.
In the first
one, Labour Councillor Rosalie Walker’s comments
neatly summarise the complaints that have been aired by a section
of residents about parking and congestion for some time: “There
are plans afoot to enlarge the stadium and put in student housing
- but it will only make things worse. People should have the option
of being able to get to their own homes without parking miles away,
so we are suggesting residents' parking on match days and a park-and-ride
from UWE or somewhere like that."
Councillor Walker will argue quite rightly that she is representing
a section of her constituents (albeit a very small one), though you
do have to ask why she has chosen to make these suggestions in a
public forum when there is currently a consultation process underway
with regard to Mem regeneration project that offers the opportunity
to both councillors and residents to put forward their views so that
they are incorporated into the project. It would appear from the
comments later on in the article that all of these ideas are already
on the table so you could also argue that there’s no reason
to raise them at a council meeting other than to generate some nice
headlines for yourself.
Just for once wouldn’t it be nice to see someone from the
local Council showing some pride in the city’s professional
sports teams and also standing up for the thousands of people who
help ensure the continued existence of the city’s sporting
institutions rather than using them continually for political point-scoring?
After all, these clubs have added hugely to the local community over
the years and will continue to do so only if people continue to support
them.
Maybe if they did that then they’d be able to look at the
problem from a different angle, one which would allow them maybe
to solve the problem rather than just make the same old comments
year in, year out. A good starting point would be the article in
today’s Post entitled “A
ROUND TRIP OF UP TO 5 HOURS”.
According to that article, a recent report by South Gloucestershire
Council's planning and transport select committee has found that
bus passengers wanting to travel to Southmead Hospital from the eastern
fringe of Bristol face journey times of up to two hours for the trip.
Now re-word that article. Couldn’t it just as easily say:
“bus passengers wanting to travel to the Memorial Stadium
from the heartlands of Rovers’ support (i.e. the eastern fringes
of the city) face journey times of up to two hours for the trip”.
Add to this a recent 20% hike in bus fares by First Group and you
may just start to understand why so many Bristolian sports fans travel
to the Mem by car. Is it really feasible to expect people to use
public transport for an afternoon of sport when for so many it involves
getting a bus into the city centre and then another one out to the
Mem?
Yes, a park and ride scheme would help alleviate a lot of the problems
on matchdays and is worth pursuing. It’s something that is
done by a number of clubs (usually those with out-of-town stadia)
and used widely. But for it to be successful then surely it will
need the backing of a number of different parties – certainly
the football club, the rugby club, the transport operator and UWE
but also both Bristol and South Gloucestershire Councils. Can we
expect that? Not judging by the comments of the Lib Dem cabinet councillor
who is in charge of the council's transport department. He’s
already said that any scheme would have to be paid for by the organisers
of the events. A quick question: do the city centre’s shops
pay for the park and ride service into town on a weekend? And would
it not make perfect sense for the Council to be a partner in such
a scheme in order to help deliver a range of environmental benefits
to the residents of Bristol while at the same time helping both the
residents of Horfield and the fans who contribute to the continued
existence of two sporting institutions?
Seemingly not – and you wonder why they’re officially
one of the worst ten Councils in the country.
|